Loading site navigation and page content
PDF download
Download the PDF attached to this article.
The headline numbers from the Q2 2026 Insurance Monitor Performance Periodical read well. Across 75 listed insurers, GCC insurance revenue grew 13.8% to USD 22.2 billion in the six months to 30 June 2026, net profit after tax rose 12.2% to USD 1.34 billion, and the aggregate Net Combined Ratio held below breakeven at 97.1%.
Read a layer down and a different story emerges. That combined ratio was 96.7% a year earlier, so margin has thinned even as volumes surged, and 29 of the 75 insurers reported losses or a decline in profit. Growth of this order consumes capital rather than creating it. For a well-capitalised insurer that strain is manageable; for one already carrying accumulated losses and operating below its solvency requirement, it is the opposite of what the balance sheet needs.
| Market | Insurance revenue growth | Net Combined Ratio | Change in NCR | Net profit growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAE | 14.5% | 92.0% | -0.7 pp | 12.6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 14.1% | 98.5% | +0.4 pp | 19.5% |
| Oman | 10.8% | 101.9% | +3.5 pp | 5.3% |
| Bahrain | 18.0% | 97.0% | -2.3 pp | -2.1% |
| Kuwait | 8.1% | 94.3% | -2.8 pp | 18.5% |
| Qatar | 15.7% | 97.7% | +3.6 pp | 0.1% |
| GCC total | 13.8% | 97.1% | +0.4 pp | 12.2% |
The clearest signal in the data is the split between insurance services and investment management as contributors to net profit. Investment management accounted for 77% in Saudi Arabia, 90% in Qatar, 85% in Kuwait and 84% in Bahrain. In Oman, insurance services contributed nothing at all: the entire market profit came from investments, against a Net Combined Ratio that deteriorated to 101.9%. Only the UAE was reasonably balanced, at 63/37.
This matters for capital because the two earnings streams have very different risk characteristics, and under the risk-based capital regimes already operating in several GCC markets and due to take effect in others they attract very different capital charges. An insurer earning its return from market risk rather than underwriting margin is not the same insurer from a solvency perspective, even if the bottom line looks identical. With cash at 44% of the KSA portfolio and 38% of the UAE portfolio, earning 2.5% and 2.8% over six months, a fall in rates would feed through to earnings immediately, with no underwriting margin to absorb it.
| Market | Insurance services contribution | Investment management contribution | Cash allocation | 6-month ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAE | 37% | 63% | 38% | 2.8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 23% | 77% | 44% | 2.5% |
| Oman | 0% | 100% | 46% | 3.5% |
| Bahrain | 16% | 84% | 22% | 3.3% |
| Kuwait | 15% | 85% | 38% | 2.9% |
| Qatar | 10% | 90% | 23% | 2.2% |
Six UAE insurers were operating below regulatory solvency levels at the half-year. Remediation is under way but slow: Insurance Monitor records one insurer selling an investment property in July to support cash flow, and another working through a phased capital injection approved by its general assembly in October 2025, of which two of three tranches have so far been actioned.
The pattern by entity size is instructive. In the UAE, the three largest insurers ran a Net Combined Ratio of 89.4% against 112.1% for the smallest cohort; in Saudi Arabia, the two largest posted 96.7% against 116.4%, with the small and very small cohorts together delivering an aggregate net loss. Scale has become the dividing line between insurers that can absorb a soft underwriting cycle and those that cannot. Motor sharpens the point: it made up 53% of gross written premium at the small Saudi insurers and 41% at the medium cohort, against 6% at the two largest, and motor ran above 100% for 15 of the 21 insurers reporting it in the first half.
This should be held in proportion, because the wider market is moving the right way. The UAE's aggregate Net Combined Ratio improved to 92.0%, with the large, medium and small cohorts all strengthening, while Kuwait improved by 2.8 points to 94.3% and Bahrain by 2.3 points to 97.0%. More fundamentally, the sector carries almost no debt (external borrowing is 0.8% of total assets in the UAE and effectively nil in Saudi Arabia). For the market as a whole that is genuine resilience as there is no refinancing wall and no interest burden to service through a soft cycle. For those already in deficit it is double-edged, since equity becomes the only route available, and the report records more than one rights issue that shareholders declined to fund.
Saudi Arabia saw an unusually dense run of capital actions: statutory reserves transferred against accumulated losses, losses offset against share premium accounts, capital reductions of up to 30% proposed.
It is worth being precise about what these achieve. Transferring a statutory reserve or share premium against accumulated losses is a balance sheet reclassification. It restores distributable reserves and removes the accumulated-loss threshold that triggers regulatory and listing consequences. It does not add any loss-absorbing capacity. Only the second leg (ie the rights issue, the strategic investor subscription, the shareholder loan conversion) does that, and those legs remain subject to approvals, which is precisely where several have failed before.
Earnings quality deserves scrutiny in its own right. A profit that is 80% investment-derived is not evidence of a functioning underwriting operation, and will not be read as one by regulators or rating agencies.
Solvency deterioration is rarely sudden. The earlier a trajectory is seen, the more options remain open, and the cheaper they are. That is the work we do at Lux Actuaries & Consultants: capital modelling and internal model development, business plan and solvency projections that stress underwriting deterioration and market shocks together rather than separately, reinsurance optimisation assessed for capital efficiency rather than expected cost alone, ERM and risk appetite frameworks, and readiness support for the risk-based capital regimes now coming into force across the region. The distinction worth holding onto through all of it is between a balance sheet that has been reclassified and one that has been recapitalised.
Data source: Insurance Monitor Q2 2026 Performance Periodical
Across 75 listed insurers, insurance revenue increased 13.8% to USD 22.225 billion, investment income rose 8.9% to USD 1.141 billion, and net profit after tax increased 12.2% to USD 1.335 billion. The aggregate Net Combined Ratio remained profitable at 97.1%, although 29 insurers reported losses or lower profit.
The UAE recorded the strongest aggregate underwriting result, with its Net Combined Ratio improving from 92.7% to 92.0%. Kuwait also improved materially to 94.3%, while Oman was the only GCC market in the report with an aggregate ratio above 100%, at 101.9%.
Investment and underwriting earnings carry different risks and capital charges. Where most profit comes from investments, lower interest rates or market shocks can weaken earnings without an underwriting margin to absorb the impact. Investment management contributed between 77% and 100% of profit in Saudi Arabia, Oman, Bahrain, Kuwait and Qatar.
Reclassification uses existing balance-sheet reserves or share premium to offset accumulated losses. It can improve distributable reserves and regulatory presentation, but it does not add loss-absorbing capital. Recapitalisation introduces new capital through measures such as a rights issue, strategic investor subscription or shareholder loan conversion.
The report shows a pronounced scale effect. The smallest UAE cohort had a Net Combined Ratio of 112.1%, compared with 89.4% for the three largest insurers. In Saudi Arabia, the very small cohort recorded 116.4%, compared with 96.7% for the two largest, while smaller insurers also carried much heavier exposure to loss-making motor business.
Insurers can combine forward-looking capital and solvency projections with integrated underwriting and market stress tests, capital-efficient reinsurance optimisation, internal model development, and clear ERM and risk appetite frameworks. Where an actual capital deficit exists, these measures support decisions but do not replace genuine new capital.
We combine global expertise with local on-the-ground presence to provide auditor-ready valuations and risk consulting. Explore our core services:
Comparing actuarial consulting firms across Africa and the Middle East by team size, office footprint, service breadth, independence, resident workforce, qualifications, and multi-standard coverage. A framework for CFOs and Chief Actuaries evaluating external partners.
When hostilities between the US, Israel, and Iran escalated in late February, the fallout for pension funds landed much closer to home than the Strait of Hormuz.
How actuaries are navigating geopolitical risk, inflation, and evolving reinsurance dynamics to strengthen GCC insurance markets in 2026 — from pricing and reserving to capital strategy.
