2nd Jul 2025, By Raghav Ohri
In GCC healthcare, we've been using the Pareto principle wrong. Yes, 30% of members drive 90% of costs- but it's not the same 30% each year. This revolving door reality is why the regulatory push toward predictive population health management isn't just smart policy- it’s also a decisive competitive advantage.
As actuaries in the GCC's rapidly evolving health insurance market, we face a fundamental challenge that goes beyond traditional risk modelling. The high-cost cohort we're managing today will largely disappear tomorrow- not because we’ve managed their costs better, but because healthcare costs follow this revolving door pattern. That surgical patient consuming significant resources this year will likely revert to the average next year. Meanwhile, someone currently in our "low-risk" pool is quietly developing diabetes or hypertension, preparing to become part of next year's high-cost 20%.
Health authorities within the GCC are now publishing formal roadmaps that make population health management non-negotiable. Saudi Arabia's CHI has released the Population Health Management Guidebook, calling for a "regulatory environment focused on prevention." Abu Dhabi's JAWDA initiatives and Qatar's National Health Strategy 2024-2030 are aligned in this direction. The message is clear: reactive cost management is failing. Predictive, value-based care is the recommended new standard.
For actuaries and insurers, aligning with this new reality begins with solving the puzzle of mean reversion – and understanding the financial consequences of getting it wrong. In a market where medical inflation consistently outpaces general inflation by 3-5 percentage points annually, and where chronic disease management can reduce per-member costs by 15-25%, the organisations that master predictive risk stratification will gain a lasting competitive edge.
If the strategy is to manage last year's most expensive members, we are already one step behind. This reactive approach is inefficient and fails to meet the call for proactive care. The issue is most visible in the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), which account for an estimated 50% of deaths across the GCC and represent the fastest-growing component of healthcare costs.
The CHI guidebook explicitly targets five priority conditions: diabetes and pre-diabetes, coronary heart disease, high blood pressure, obesity, and tobacco use. These conditions develop over time, often silently, within the "healthy 70%" of the population. This is particularly challenging in the GCC's unique demographic context, where expatriate populations bring varied health literacy levels, cultural approaches to preventive care, and risk profiles based on country of origin.
Relying on retrospective claims data means we miss the critical window to intervene early. The result is a system chasing costs that have already been incurred rather than predicting and mitigating risk. In a relatively young population where diabetes prevalence exceeds 20% and cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality, this reactive approach represents both a clinical and financial failure.
This analytical gap becomes a critical financial risk as the market moves towards new reimbursement models. The CHI Guidebook states that the PHM Program is a "crucial foundation for supporting our wider Value-based health care (VBHC) strategy." For integrated "payvider" models and value-based bundle contracts, failure to predict risk accurately will directly impact financial performance.
The financial stakes are considerable. Early adopters of population health models have reported cost reductions of 8-12% in the first year, with savings accelerating as programmes mature. Conversely, reactive players face the risk of adverse selection in an increasingly maturing market, where more sophisticated competitors can price risk more accurately and manage loss ratios more effectively.
Major regional insurers are already building the infrastructure for this proactive future. Players like Bupa Arabia and Tawuniya are developing advanced VBHC and disease management programmes. Similar models are emerging from Dubai Health Authority's patient journey redesign to Qatar's National Diabetes Program. Yet the success of these initiatives depends on identifying the right members at the right time and with the right initiatives- something that requires moving beyond retrospective data toward predictive frameworks aligned with regulation.
To support this shift, actuarial analysis must evolve to match the person-centred, data-driven philosophy at the core of PHM. The CHI Guidebook defines Population Health Management as a model that "addresses the population and individuals' health needs at all points along the continuum of care through the development of data driven, cost-effective and evidence-based interventions." This solution lies within that definition.
Achieving this requires a forward-looking, predictive lens that accommodates the sophisticated data and acknowledges the demographic complexity of GCC. The PHM cycle mandated by CHI begins with the foundational step: to “Define and understand the population," which includes performing robust "risk stratification." This cannot be done with a back-of-the-envelope approach.
It requires individual-level modelling to assess expected morbidity burden, drawing on clinical, pharmacy, and behavioural data to account for treatment compliance and care-seeking behaviours.
This represents a significant evolution from traditional actuarial methods, but one being enabled by established person-focused risk adjustment systems. Methodologies like the Johns Hopkins ACG System, (recommended by the CHI), as well as emerging AI-driven and locally calibrated models, are designed to see the full clinical picture and forecast future needs. They provide the analytical horsepower required to effectively manage an evolving risk pool and deliver on PHM mandates, while respecting the diverse needs of populations.
The convergence of regulatory mandates, shifting demographics, and financial pressures creates an urgent imperative for action. Healthcare leaders should consider several critical steps:
Immediate Actions
Medium-Term Investments
Long-Term Strategic Positioning
Organisations that act decisively will not only ensure compliance but will also capture the economic and reputational benefits of proactive population health management. Those that remain reactive risk being left behind in an evolving market.
The modern health actuary’s role is evolving. We must design and deliver the analytical engines that power predictive population health strategies—moving from hindsight to foresight.
By embracing predictive, person-centered population health management, we stop chasing yesterday's costs and start managing tomorrow’s health. In doing so, we turn regulatory compliance from a burden into a long-term competitive advantage.
The revolving door of high-cost care will continue to turn, but with the right tools and strategic approach, we can finally predict who will walk through it next — and intervene before they do.
Need support navigating the shift to value-based healthcare?
At Lux Actuaries, we partner with payers, providers, and regulators across the GCC to deliver predictive, population-focused strategies that drive better outcomes. Talk to our health analytics team to explore how we can support your organisation’s PHM journey.
Abu Dhabi
ernest.louw@luxactuaries.comSaudi Arabia
shivash@luxactuaries.comGreece
vasilis@luxactuaries.comEast Africa
joseph.birundu@luxactuaries.comNorth Africa - Egypt
ahmed.nagy@luxactuaries.comNorth Africa - Francophone
mohammed.moussaif@luxactuaries.comSouthern Africa
siobhain.omahony@luxactuaries.comWest Africa
jimoh.sunmonu@luxactuaries.comSubscribe to our newsletter
To receive your quarterly updates.
By completing this form you are opting into emails from Lux Actuaries. You can unsubscribe at any time.
© 2025 All rights reserved.